>>64597

> Ахахахахахаха

> Во вконтакте вижу такие же фотографии больших закупок неработающих фуфлыжных БАДов, и?

> Ещё один впечатлительный лошок в твоём лице успешно найден.

> вконтакте

> еще лошок найден

Кишечная микрофлора оценивает вселенную доступными ей категориями.
Так и должно быть.

Вот например, лошки с реддита слегонца опустили финансовых воротил на ярды.

И это только по шортерам итоги, не считая того, что этот случай поставил на рога весь истаблишмент, от сенаторов, до министров.

А прокуроры штатов уже выстраиваются в очередь на еблю пидарасов-робингудов.

Также, как голливудские гиганты рубятся между собой за права на экранизацию этой заварушки, этих лошков.

И это при том, что горе-шортиры даже ни разу не наебывали лошков с фуфломицинами.
А просто играли в свои игры.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameStop_short_squeeze#Impact_on_involved_entities

Impact on involved entities.

Losses by short sellers.

By January 28, 2021, Melvin Capital, an investment fund that heavily shorted GameStop, had lost 30 percent of its value since the start of 2021, and by the end of January had suffered a loss of 53 percent of its investments.[18][78][79] Citadel LLC and firm partners then invested $2 billion into Melvin, while Point72 Asset Management's investment added $750 million, for a total investment of $2.75 billion,[80][81][82] before Melvin told CNBC that they covered (closed) their position on January 26, although the exact amount was not disclosed.[83] According to Morgan Stanley, a number of hedge funds covered their short positions and sold shares in their portfolio to reduce leverage and market exposure, in some of the largest such actions within 10 years.[84] On January 26, it was reported that short sellers lost a total of $6 billion due to the squeeze.[85] On January 27, a Melvin Capital spokesperson stated that the fund had closed its position after repositioning its portfolio.[86] Melvin ended January with more than $8 billion in assets after having started the year with roughly $12.5 billion in assets.[87] On February 1, GameStop short interests fell to 39 percent of free-floating shares, from 114 percent in mid-January, according to IHS Markit. The data was described by Bloomberg News as "potentially an early sign that the short squeeze that propelled GameStop... has progressed."[88]

According to a report by Bloomberg, Andrew Left, an activist short seller and head of Citron Research, had also shorted the stock and claimed to have closed the position as a total loss.[22][89] In an interview, he claimed that the company had covered the majority of its short positions in the range of $90 per share at a loss of 100 percent, retaining a small, manageable position.[90] Due to the enormous losses, Left stated that Citron Research would discontinue offering short-sell analysis after 20 years of service, and instead focus on "long side multibagger opportunities for individual investors".[91]

Losses on short positions in U.S. firms topped $70 billion. Data from equity analytics firm Ortex showed that as of January 27, there were loss-making short positions on more than 5,000 U.S. firms.[92]

According to the New York Times, the viability of short selling as an investment strategy has been called in question as a result of the short squeeze.[93]