Люди добрые, помогите исправить ошибки вот в этом ебаном эссе.

It is a common belief that Russia has its own unique character, fundamentally different from the countries of Europe and Asia.Indeed, Russia is located in two parts of the world at the same time and throughout the entire history it absorbs the culture of different countries that differ in mentality.
Despite its geographical position, Russia still has much more in common with Western culture than with the culture of the East. This is due to many factors, some of which I would like to point out. First, the Russian language is part of the Indo-European language family, its writing, like the Latin script itself, comes from Greek writing. From this it follows that it is easier for the Russian person to understand the European peoples who speak similar languages. Latin and Greek letters do not seem to us to be something extraterrestrial and inaccessible to understanding, unlike, for example, Chinese letters. Our language as a whole has a huge number of common features with the languages ​​of Europe, which facilitates cultural contact with its inhabitants. Secondly, even though most of Russia is located in the Asian part of the continent, its main cultural centers - St. Petersburg and Moscow - are located in the European part. It is two capitals that set the fashion and direction of development for the whole country, while the influence of the settlements located in the Asian part is minimal. Thirdly, in view of the policy begun by Peter, Russia rushed even more towards the West. And fourthly, of course, we share a common religion with the West, and, consequently, Christian values.
One should not think, however, that Russia is a purely European country. On its territory there are many peoples, partly assimilated, but still affecting the culture and mentality of the Russian people. For example, Russia has long been characterized by collectivism. In confirmation of this, you can bring the social structure of pre-revolutionary villages and the communist experiment that lasted almost as long as 70 years. Another example is the fact that in Russia people were usually not placed at the center of the universe, their interests were not placed above nature.
Combining the characteristics of different cultures, Russia unwittingly develops its own culture and does not look like any other. For example, the value orientation of the Russian person is simultaneously materialistic, but at the same time irrational. A Russian person would rather dream and pray to God for a better life, material welfare, rather than try to achieve all this. It is also worth remembering once again about collectivism, which is gradually dying, but it is still inherent in the older generation of Russians, who still lived under the Soviet Union. But collectivism in Russia has never been, let's say, a firmly ingrained part of the mentality. He was rather a necessity, because of which he became unviable after the change of the state system. In eastern Japan, for example, collectivism has always been the basis of national identity.
In such a compact essay, unfortunately, does not cover all aspects of this problem, however, I think even the examples I have cited are enough to conclude that Russia, for the time being, still combines the features of so different cultures of East and West, but the west more and more pulls the blanket over himself.